This is in reference to the fact that she has filed a $100 million dollar lawsuit against E*Trade because she thinks the company's talking baby "Milkaholic" ad is a direct reference to her. E*Trade is expecting to counter the suit by alleging that anything that ties Lindsay Lohan to their company can only act as a detriment so why would they court that kind of failure? Also, they'll note that there's no way the baby could be a seen as a direct reference to Lohan, seeing as the baby Lindsay has some sort of discernible acting future.
In additional Lohan news the entire country of India is considering banning her from ever again setting foot on their soil after she made false claims about child trafficking, India, and her role in rescuing child slaves during a BBC documentary she participated in. You remember that BBC documentary, right?
You know Lindsay, I think we all just thought that someday you'd either be doing porn or be dead of an overdose. There was no third option we had considered. It's so great to see you just go totally off in this unexpected direction of filing frivolous $100 million dollar lawsuits against baby commercials and getting thrown out of most of South Asia before one of those two happens.
No comments:
Post a Comment