In the six weeks since Mr. Geithner took over as Treasury secretary, he and a skeleton crew of unofficial senior advisers have been racing to make decisions that will shape the future of the banking, insurance, housing and automobile industries.That's good, I mean our economy is pretty small an not that complex, so I'm thinking we only need 2-3 guys tops to get a handle on fixing it when it's in a complete tailspin. One to write all the new regulations, one to administer all the money, and one to prepare the suicide pills and write the suicide note to explain to future societies what exactly happened before the economy crumbled.
But even as he maintains a frenetic pace — unveiling plans, testifying before Congress and negotiating new bailouts with the likes of Citigroup, General Motors and the American International Group — there are signs that events are getting ahead of him.
...
Compounding the strain on the Treasury, almost all the top posts beneath Mr. Geithner are still vacant. Though he has hired about 50 senior advisers — about half the number he hopes to recruit — the White House has become so worried about potential tax problems and other issues in the backgrounds of candidates that it has nominated only a handful of people.
...
That still left many positions, including the No. 2 post at Treasury, without even a nominee.
Worse still, Obama is afraid of bad publicity on tax info to nominate anyone with any speed. Apparently if you're any good at this whole financial game, you're probably also an obvious tax cheat. Why not just push through nominees irrespective of their relative "scandal" status because while fixing the economy, though massively important, might not happen, it might be smart to have a full staff making the attempt? I don't know, either. I think in times like this, not taking a cheap political hit off of manufactured Republican outrage is more important than having a Treasury Department comprised of more than one person.
No comments:
Post a Comment